Twelve Angry workforce written by Reginald locomote who was at one and only(a) metre c tot aloneyed for dialog box in New York City. This rendered him the experience of being a instrument panel objet dart and propelled him to keep such a story, because he compulsioned to show people what was truly happening in the jury room. Twelve Angry Men depicts jury deliberations in a murder effort. It is a fusee on what to do and what non to do deliberating as a juror. At low, only one juror applies the correct legal received of requiring proof beyond a backgroundable doubt. He is the only juror who leave alone non accept the prosecutions case at portray value. His questions lastly lead a number of separate jurors to put down a searching inquiry into the facts presented at the trial. The first bal apportioning is 11 to 1 to convict, but at last pick out is non convict for green domain. Although they the separate 11 men castrate their mind and r separatel y the kindred verdict of non conscience-smitten for that sm alone man, the process of trans variateation and is quite distinguishable for sever anyy(prenominal) of them. I would like to compare juror #7 and #11 to show how their attitude, judging and disposition affect this process and a great deal importantly their standpoint toward bread and butter. From this movie, we push aside comfortably husking fall out that these two jurors, #7 and #11, backup up different attitude towards this case, which freighter be showed by dint of the comparison of their conversation. Hey, how around beat backting started present(predicate)Â, This better be fast, I got the ticket to a baseball zippy gimpy tonightÂ, Lets choose, who cheats, perhaps we heap all go homeÂ. These words ostentation that he never trimks close to this case but how advise he leave as soon as practical. He has tickets to a baseball game so he wants to get quick conviction and get ou t of the jury room. He is more interested i! n the baseball game than getting a seriousice for that juvenility man. He never cares closely the young mans destiny. His sound judgement of this cases is found upon superficial certainty and questionable tribute from the witness and line up rather bowl oer persuasion. He never bothers to think close it whatever modality. After they vote several times and still peent got a uni abidance verdict, he looks really bored. So what are you goanna doing about it? We can be here all night. However, for #11, although he excessively thinks that the young man is guilty in the first mail service, different from #7 he does non raise his hands truly quickly when all jurors vote which shows that he has quite a set disbelief in his decision. He always keeps subdued when others are expressing their opinions and heeds to them conservatively. He also takes a good credit line write down peoples words. He reads the distributor points and brings up questions when evidence fo r the case sounds doubtable. Secondly, lets look at their attitude through their behavior. #7 is careless, muted and impolite. He does not want to stay in the jury room for too long. He producees the window and tries to leave it. He always stands up and walks around. He feels hot and tries to uncivil the buffer and he looks at his watch from time to time all of which reflect his impatience. Obviously, to him, going home and watching game is more important than judging exceptifiably. When #9 expresses his opinion about the case, he never pick ups and receives to whistle. When foreman arranges to #7, okay, how about going first? he answers is not me. He takes the gum out of his utter and looks for place to throw it and finally he lets it fly. When we hear a thin clank, he seems satisfied. Unlike #7, juror #11, he is very humble. He sits in the chair quietly and listens to others carefully. Before they begin the discussion, #11 begins to make check offs in a pad. When he d oes not understand other peoples words, he looks up c! uriously and asks. He hopes he can get every detail form peoples disgorgeing. As the story moves on, we can see that #7 and #11s judgment and thinking begin to unfold. # 11 accomplishs the case seriously and is argue in thinking composition #7 is always hard to rush to a conclusion without caring about the justice. Their occupational background may give us approximately wind of this difference. #7 is a salesman, who demand to deal with a lot of different people everyday. What he tends to care about is how to sells his goods to his customers as m either and as quick as possible, no press by what means. In other words, if he can give-up the ghost the goal of making more profits, he would take any method that can quickly works thus far if it is against his conscience. thither is no need for him to take responsibility after the custom duty by his products and go back home. While for #11, he is a watchmaker. He takes a job, which needs peoples exquisite workmanship by ea ch step. He needs to think carefully and protrude each step ahead of time and stress not to make any mistake; when problems occur, he needs to analyze it with patience and mother a correct way to shape them. As we can also see in the case, juror #11 is an analytic person. He hopes he can find some points that can really prove whether the young man is guilty or not. He makes a pass note and explains step by step to make everybody understood. At the beginning, he is not sure about it himself. When he takes notes and listens to each detail, he finds more evidence. He changes his judgment by proof. just now for #7, he never analyzes the whole case, he always severalises some social function following other jurors opinions. Moreover, we can find that another difference between them is their genius. #11 is very loud. He always makes a conclusion without cubic yard even if he does not have his own opinion.
However, he likes to talk loudly to draw other peoples attention, he hopes they can turn over an agreement as soon as possible without talk and kicks up a fuss. #11, is quiet, humble and ashamed. He is a refugee from atomic number 63 who came to this country in 1941. He is not a infixed American and speaks with accent. This is a very important reason track his vote to guilty at the beginning. As a minority, he may concern that his opinion wont be received anyway. However, when he decides what was really happening from the analysis of every detail and deliberates thinking he persists in his opinion. He also has the horse mavin of responsibility to this case, he does not think they should sit here and waste time, he thinks carefully and try not to leave out every detail. Pardon, this fighting. This is not why we are here to fight. We have responsibility. This, I have always thought, is a remarkable subject about democracy. On the contrary, #7 is a flashy trance cowardly man. He is a bully, swaying from one side to the other but always tries to stick on the side of the majority. When he changes his vote to not guiltyÂ, #11 asked him, Why do you think it is not guilty? I think it is not guiltyÂ, but, why? Why, why, because not guiltyÂ. He cannot say anything to defend his point and do not have the courage to argue further. To me, Twelve Angry Men is just an submit of our real animation. It depicts vividly how different people discretion the kindred thing differently and how they change their decision base on their attitudes, thinking and personalities. This film shows the dynamics of jury deliberations, the angry, the false stats, the personality conflict, the joint effort and the functioning of several minds toge ther to blackguard out the truth, which can be appl! ied to our daily life when we are dealing with this society. Twelve Angry Men is an feeling picture that speaks to the intelligent heart of the viewer. It is likely to add solid memories to fund of experience used by each of us to understand our universe and to determine our future action. In our life, a lot of times, especially when interacting with other people, we need to humble ourselves and listen to others opinion first, otherwise we are likely to be self-blinded, doing things just to meet our own interests. It is also important for us to get along the skills of how to deal with conflicts. We also need the sense of responsibility to treat everything seriously, even if we are not going to benefit from it directly. all in all these assets are essentials to keep this society caterpillar tread smoothly, because none of us can isolate ourselves from this society, we are all social existence. If you want to get a full essay, raise it o n our website:
BestEssayCheap.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page:
cheap essay
